Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 4521 - 4540 of 25,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2013, 10:09 am by Alan Rozenshtein
As Steve noted on Tuesday, the government petitioned for rehearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am by Wells Bennett
Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm by Benjamin Wittes
L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), held that the “United State’s authority to detain an enemy combatant is not dependent on whether an individual would be a threat to the United States or its allies if released but rather upon the continuation of hostilities. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
Alfonso, 759 F.2d at 736; United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm by John Inazu
Three weeks ago, Stanley Fish's essay "The First Amendment and Kittens" reflected on the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Last week, the Sixth Circuit, on the government's motion, published the previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:24 am by Florian Mueller
The Recorder also says she has a key role but mentions (in the first place) Peter Bicks, a commercial litigation attorney who has apparently had spectacular successes at jury trials in many different parts of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:17 pm by Joy Waltemath
Both groups are eligible for the same retirement and healthcare benefits, and personal days off. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Eric Goldman
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
Inadmissibility Series I: INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Prostitution Inadmissibility Series INA 212– Part V 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 lists a series of classes of foreign nationals who are inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
On June 16, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule revising patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) in view of Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]