Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 4,681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Mar. 27, 2006) (dismissing a Section 349 claim arising out of an attorney-client relationship for failure to state a consumer protection claim) (citing, inter alia, Exxonmobil Inter-America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:10 am
Since then, approximately fifty million abortions have been committed in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:05 am
District Court for the Western District, styled United States of America v Paul Hollern, Case No. 3:06CR-82-S. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
Jan. 7, 2008), a company brought Guatemalan and Mexican workers to the United States for seasonal employment under H-2B visas. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
The President does (Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
In other cases, the law on the books does not reflect law in practice. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
Mercedes-Benz of North America, 833 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1987) rely on the seminal article by Benjamin Klein & Lester F. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:15 am
America has 2.5 children. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 8:11 am
Paul, Minnesota, ruled in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:45 pm
The court relied particularly on its 1999 decision in Olmer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
But it does not. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Communication between health and education systems regarding a child's needs and care plan either does not occur or is not consistent. [read post]
