Search for: "Ex Parte Day" Results 4521 - 4540 of 6,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
... at least in ex parte proceedings. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:22 pm by Lovechilde
On Saturday, as Glenn Greenwald reports, "in Somalia, the U.S. fired missiles from a drone and killed the 27-year-old Lebanon-born, ex-British citizen Bilal el-Berjawi. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:06 pm by mstein03
To subject every bit of content to ex ante review to ensure ownership, under the threat of criminal sanctions, removes the dynamism on which an entire social and business paradigm depend. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Curiously, the Notice predicts that all owner initiated ex parte patent reexamination filings will be filed as SE requests going forward. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:56 am by Benjamin Wittes
’” The judge said he may agree to intervene on the defense team’s behalf with the CA if it continues to insist that the defense cannot submit certain parts of its request revealing theories of the case ex parte. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:23 pm by Steve Graham
  The suit was filed on December 14th at around 1 p.m., and an ex parte order was signed about 90 minutes later. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:10 pm by Matt Brown
I’m not hanging around with ex-presidents. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:41 am by Michelle O'Neil
Kim Kardashian reportedly will keep all her premarital assets as well as income she earned during her 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
If the witness’s false testimony has obstructed the court in 663*663 the performance of its duty, the witness may be met with sanctions for civil contempt, see Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U.S. 378, 383, 39 S.Ct. 337, 339, 63 L.Ed. 656 (1919), or criminal contempt, see In re Michael, 326 U.S. 224, 227-29, 66 S.Ct. 78, 79-80, 90 L.Ed. 30 (1945). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:11 pm by Benjamin Wittes
First, she neglects to mention that the prosecution actually joined the defense’s motion to present its requests for expert assistance ex parte; this is, in other words, not a situation in which the prosecution is trying to use expert assistance requests as a window into defense strategy. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 3:53 pm by Mandelman
 For example, the only thing I found at all shocking upon learning that Newt Gingrich had asked his now ex-wife if they could have an “open marriage,” was that there were more than two women (or even one gay man), that would even consider having sex with Newt. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:54 am by Ritika Singh
Third, the judge heard a defense motion objecting to the government’s ex parte application seeking safeguards of national security information under the Military Commissions Act of 2009. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:25 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
File a one-sided ex parte demand and, viola, a content owner has won its case. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:55 am by Paul Levy
Because Paul has brought an ex parte motion, there is nobody to call this authority to the court’s attention.  Consequently, we are considering whether to file an amicus brief doing just that.  We may well suggest to the judge in the case that she reprimand Paul’s lawyers for filing an ex parte  brief that withholds relevant authority.  In Career Agents Network v. careeragentsnetwork.biz, the withholding of relevant Sixth… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:23 am by Raffaela Wakeman
  I will briefly list these, in the order of filing, along with any results decided by the judge, just to recap: First, a defense motion to allow requests for expert assistance to be ex parte and with limited notice to the opposing party. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
And, When a supplemental instruction is given ex parte, without first consulting counsel, it violates a defendant's right to be present. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm by Rick
In any event, SOPA/PIPA is why a number of websites, including this one, will be offline for at least part of the day on January 18, 2012. [read post]