Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE" Results 4521 - 4540 of 4,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:57 am by Michael Madison
” (Hari Osofsky, Penn State University) “Institutional pluralism means that each law school will choose its own path. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am by Clerquette LeClerq
Then he asks SS whether the panel was "fair" to Frank Ricci and his fellow firefighters. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm by Howard Knopf
In its July 6, 2012 decision in this case from 2012, it said with uncharacteristic frankness:[112] The quantum proposed by Re:Sound, $86million, is at least five times as much as whatRe:Sound receives from commercial radiostations. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:58 am by Declan Hamill
For example, where a treatment for a disease condition alleviates or reduces the need for surgical operations, hospitalization, or physician time, the expenditure on the medicine must be evaluated from a holistic perspective given that other healthcare costs have been reduced[v]. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]