Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 4521 - 4540 of 57,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2010, 10:10 pm by Barry Eagar
The Case: Sports Warehouse, Inc. v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 664The Venue: The Federal Court of AustraliaJudge: Kenny JCommentThe Trade Marks Act allows the registration of trade marks with low levels of distinctiveness where sufficient use is shown by the applicant and where that is as a trade mark in the course of trade. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:57 am by Jay Lechner
In the first class action over 401(k) fees to be tried and decided on its merits, a Missouri federal district court ruled in March that manufacturer ABB Inc. breached its Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary duties — and must pay $35.2 million to the plaintiff class for (1) failing to monitor the recordkeeping fees and revenue-sharing payments made to the plan’s trust company, (2) failing to negotiate rebates to offset or reduce the cost of… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch For the second time, the Supreme Court has issued a GVR decision in the patent subject-matter-eligibility case of WILDTANGENT, INC. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Eve at the time sentenced him to 6 1/2 years for defrauding investors in Hollinger International Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Eve at the time sentenced him to 6 1/2 years for defrauding investors in Hollinger International Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
United Healthcare Services, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 4, 2016), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) held that UCL, FAL, and other claims brought on behalf of a putative class of members of a health care plan governed by the federal Medicare Advantage program (a Part C plan) were expressly preempted by the Medicare Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Apotex, Inc. where the Federal Circuit affirmed that method claims for “once-daily dosing would likely survive an anticipation challenge by a prior advertisement that disclosed twice-daily dosing. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:15 am by Gene Quinn
Petitioners Activision Blizzard, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 2k Sports, Inc., and Rockstar Games, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by Rantanen
The recent dissents from en banc rehearing in Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]