Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 4521 - 4540 of 6,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
Decision #1:  Connecticut Supreme Court This morning my friends over at Abnormal Use beat me to a description of the most interesting recent case addressing malfunction theory, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:38 am by Bruce Nye
  Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Max Factor
” Porter v Wyner, 2010 Cal.App.LEXIS 487 (decided April 8, 2010) and Cassel v Superior Court (2009) 179 Cal App 4th 152 (review granted by California Supreme Court, Case No. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:27 am
Applying the terms of disciplinary settlement agreementPerretti v NYC Transit Auth., 283 AD2d 737 The New York City Transit Authority challenged a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board granting one of its employees, Frank P. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:37 am by Alicia Feichtmeir
  Injunctions enjoining disclosure of the reports were granted in King County Superior Court on the same grounds. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm by Elie Mystal
Let us know at tips@abovethelaw.com (subject line: “Gregory Berry”).Meanwhile, we all wait with bated breath for the Kasowitz response.GREGORY BERRY — EMAILS SENT TO HIS CLASSMATES AT PENN LAWSubject: The People of the State of California v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
The trial court granted defendant's motion and ordered judgment in defendant's favor. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:00 pm by Lyne Duhaime
By Lyne Duhaime On June 21, 2011, in Canadian Jewish Congress v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Raveendran Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in Central Board of Secondary Education Vs. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
BAP 1999), the Trustee argued that the ruling had been undermined by the Supreme Court's decision in Drye v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
Dewani’s lawyers argued that the extradition proceedings were not only an abuse of the process of the court, but if extradition was granted, it would be a breach of the defendant’s human rights, particularly Articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention. [read post]