Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
He’s got MERS in his crosshairs, apparently exactly where he wants them, and in the 18 pages that follow his decision to grant the relief from the automatic stay he goes after MERS mercilessly. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In relation to “disconnection” he said “This is a serious sanction. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:57 pm
Krishna Bajaj (“Krishna Bajaj”), holder of 0.29% of the shares in SIL, intervened in these petitions objecting to the amalgamation. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
Holder, the Ninth Circuit considered the case of an individual who married his fiancee while he was in removal proceedings. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
The AmeriKat will be gone next weekend as she will be finishing off (or writing) a book chapter on the Viacom v YouTube litigation, but will be back the following week with news of Microsoft's Supreme Court filing in the i4i case. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
He, like me, assumes that somebody found it on SSRN. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:02 am
In the case of State of Bihar v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Chambers); and Tetz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Kemp v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
He argued that Nijhawan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
The Ninth Circuit granted the Petition for Review in Singh v Holder, specifically finding that the IJ/BIA's credibility findings were not supported by the record. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:54 am
The moment he said he'd go pop if there was anything else coming from the Court of Justice of the European Union today, the IPKat realised that the fates were bound to conspire against him. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:19 am
A holder’s right accrues when it acquires its trademark. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:44 am
This question hopefully will be answered by the Virginia Supreme Court in a case called Watergate at Landmark Condominium Owners Association v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:25 am
Magner Limited v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
For example, we have stated that, "'[w]hen no prior art other than that which was considered by the PTO examiner is relied on by the attacker, he has the added burden of overcoming the deference that is due to a qualified government agency presumed to have properly done its job.'" PowerOasis, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
We used to do a fortnightly post giving links and the abstracts to the articles published in the Social Science Research Network that are related to arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
Holder, which casts doubt on the district court’s calculation of the recommended Guidelines sentence in this case. [read post]
