Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 7,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 5:53 pm
Among those programs covered by the House bill is the SLS. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:33 pm
This is why they pay close attention to prisoner civil rights claims in assuring they do not clog up the federal courts.The case is Faulk v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
Drug and Device Law’s readership, so far as we could tell, consisted of (1) other lawyers at large firms who defended pharmaceutical product liability cases, (2) plaintiffs’ lawyers who labored on the opposite side of that “v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
EFF also submitted an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case Octane Fitness v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:23 am
Here’s the opinion in You Fit v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:48 am
His decision to stay close to the work site was a personal one, the majority found. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Durrant v Avon & Somerset Constabulary [2013] EWCA Civ 1624This is not housing law, not even close, but is an important decision on procedure that follows on from Mitchell v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Durrant v Avon & Somerset Constabulary [2013] EWCA Civ 1624This is not housing law, not even close, but is an important decision on procedure that follows on from Mitchell v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 6:14 am
The inside of his suitcase housed his laptop, which he cushioned using clothing sealed in Ziploc bags [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:05 am
Is the privilege and contempt "jurisdiction" of the Houses of Australian Parliaments necessarily exclusive in such matters? [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
Gila River Camp, Arizona Korematsu v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:50 pm
He also relies, somewhat less persuasively, on the close relationship between the government and the carriers as far exceeding any reasonable expectation of erosion of privacy. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
In Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:05 am
Matter closed. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals this week, including the closely watched case about a former equity partner’s mandatory retirement in McCormick v. [read post]
