Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 4521 - 4540
of 182,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
This week's host, 22 year old Canadian Medical student Vitum Medicinus takes an interesting approach: not content with including helpful context and a thoughtful layout, VM explains why each post is a "must-read," and even hands out "awards" based on a post's topic.There are almost 3 dozen excellent choices, so you really can't go wrong with any of them. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:17 am
Why would Big Tech be interested in books? [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:42 am
Here's an interesting take on the handing over of Washington High School to a developer for housing and commercial space: The president of the Buckman neighborhood association says she's o.k. with it, even though it means that the building won't house a community center. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:13 pm
Here's how the 2d DCA explained where the court went wrong and why: The [trustee] . . . argues that the trial court erred in ordering that he return to Sondra's guardian ad litem “all of the funds and assets which were turned over to [the appellant] ... plus interest on those funds at the legal rate. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:45 pm
Even if it weren’t for Google’s metrics, I would know that SmallGovCon has filled an important information gap from the comments I receive whenever I am on the road at industry events. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
More:If I'm applying the First Amendment, I have to apply it to a world where there's an Internet, and there's Facebook, and there are movies like ... 'The Social Network,' which I couldn't even understand," he said.Oy.It doesn't get better:Although Breyer was making a point about judicial philosophy, he also touched on the court's sometimes limited grasp of technological developments. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:24 am
” There are some really interesting things in this speech on counterproposals, etc., although there isn’t much that helps those companies grappling with proxy access shareholder proposals this proxy season (but there is some, such as #6 below). [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 2:36 pm
My girlfriend always tells me about these books she’s reading, and I don’t even see her reading the book! [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
Radio Iowa reports that the Iowa Department of Revenue wants to babysit your tax refund interest-free a little longer: "Currently... [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:36 pm
An interesting and important decision, though one based on state law and thus not much applicable outside Oregon. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:47 am
That’s simple. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 10:34 am
Last night I was reading through Larry Solum's Legal Theory Lexicon and it struck me that there isn't really anything comparable for left/critical legal theory. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:12 pm
Here's another interesting tidbit from Tony Fabelo's testimony this afternoon: Texas' high incarceration rates haven't corresponded with crime reductions enjoyed by other states that incarcerate far fewer people. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:57 am
Interesting that the court doesn’t even need to do that, and can rely on basic plausibility. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:05 am
Barring those suits is not in the best interests of society, the court said. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
It’s clear that non-publication of the black museum means that there is no public interest defence. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 10:48 am
(Already blogged 2 posts down.)The discussion there is interesting, though it's not about the full-scale life transition that you see with transgender people or with what Dolezal seems to have done. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:52 am
Just because you can't or won't do a government official's job in its entirety doesn't mean it's wrong to criticize the way that work is done. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm
All very interesting stuff; but footnote 6 was especially interesting in terms of how (and by whom) this case was tried and (where it gets) appealed:Due to special statutorily mandated procedures, this action was heard by a Second District Court of Appeal justice [2/6's Justice Perren] acting as the trial court, and the appeal was assigned to this court even though the action was brought and adjudicated in Alameda County. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:38 pm
Last term, the Court’s unanimous decision in Lexmark foreshadowed a major doctrinal shift in the area of third-party standing. [read post]
