Search for: "In Re Kennedy"
Results 4521 - 4536
of 4,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2006, 5:23 am
So, using "to pretext" as meaning to lie (or, minimally, to falsely pretend), George and company pretexted about WMDs, pretexted about the use of rendition and torture, pretexted about the real reasons for using military tribunals (the "real reason was that they knew civilian courts would not let in evidence obtained by torture), pretexted about the competence of the government's response to Katrina (remember "You're doing a heck of a job Brownie?) [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 8:47 pm
If you're a vendor that has released a new product or is new to the legal market, send an email to newswire at peerviews dot com. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 12:18 pm
Deniis Kennedy directed me to Ed Yourdon's blog. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 7:26 pm
Most vendors believe that mobile devices will play a large role in the evolution of their products and services, but they're not sure what form it will take; 5. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
Kennedy issued his decision Sept. 16, 2003. *** In Re James Simpson (AD-50; 347 NLRB No. 85) Memphis, TN Aug. 9, 2006. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 10:54 am
(He obviously is not fond of those statutes, enacted as they were decades before 9/11/01; but if he's right that they're obsolete, why is the proper remedy not a legislative (and public) debate about whether and how to amend them to respond to modern exigencies?) [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
Moreover, in the recent Texas gerrymandering case, I think it is relevant, in analyzing Justice Kennedy's strange opinion, to note his Republican background, since he is clearly sympathetic to the argument that Texas Democrats in effect deserved some payback for their egregious 1990 gerrymander. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 7:05 am
So people are reading these articles, but they're not being downloaded from SSRN. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 8:17 pm
Drug markets and the problematic reentry of many prisoners are both artifacts of the war on drugs, which is another way of saying they're problems because our government has decided to make them problems. [read post]
28 Jun 2006, 1:04 pm
You're reminded that he used to be a professor. 3. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 8:07 pm
I also think Scalia and Kennedy's decisions will go a far way in getting better instructions in 1983 actions.That's all for now. [read post]
19 May 2006, 12:21 pm
In the worst case you lose and pay your costs and perhaps part of the defendant's (depending on the jurisdiction), but otherwise, you're very likely to settle the dispute by granting a license or selling your rights, in return to some payment which may be bigger or smaller, depending on how bestseller the work is and how credibly you can hold up the publisher. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
Webb, 403 F.3d 373, 385 n.9 (6th Cir. 2005) (declining "to indicate what weight the district courts must give to the appropriate Guidelines range, or any other § 3553(a) factor"); see also id. at 385 (Kennedy, J., dissenting). [read post]
25 Aug 2005, 7:38 pm
You're killing us with this request... [read post]
24 Mar 2005, 10:31 am
[JURIST] AP is reporting that the US Supreme Court has just refused to issue an emergency stay in the Schiavo case, and will not order re-insertion of her feeding tube. [read post]
1 Feb 2003, 12:25 pm
[JURIST] NASA has posted an official statement on Saturday's loss of the space shuttle Columbia [Kennedy Space Center backgrounder] on re-entry at the end of mission STS-107 [mission backgrounder]. [read post]
