Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 11:24 am
So it was with great interest that I read a post over at the Seattle Trademark Lawyer Blog laying out how damages were calculated in favor of Starbucks in a trademark infringement case it recently won. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
The problem seems somewhat analogous to the problem of involving houses or committees of Congress in the administration of statutes that was invalidated in INS v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am
In Plain English: Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
The first part is from an oft-repeated Supreme Court standard for the methodology of how to evaluate probable cause first announced in Brinegar v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:02 am
See, e.g., Coover v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:10 pm
Supreme Court’s 61-year old decision in Ewing v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:21 am
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
" La Chambre vérifie donc si la présentation tardive des requêtes peut se justifier. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Compare NAACP v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:30 am
The court’s analysis explained that it was bound by Supreme Court precedent in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:05 am
., et al v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:01 am
Ivy Press v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
Judge Melvin was the plaintiff in one of the earliest Doe cases to reach the appellate level, Melvin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
On Thursday, Justice Baxter lays it all out for you. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In its November 16, 2017 decision in Greco v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:53 am
The NLJ article mentions McDonough v. the Catholic University of America (83 F.3d 455 (D.C. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:18 am
The point is, don't lay down for the state. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am
That order was issued in the Clinic’s case Gusciora v. [read post]
