Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 6,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am
(ArsTechnica) Global – Patents With $4.5 billion bid, group led by Apple and Microsoft claims Nortel patents (Prior Art) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Tangible IP) (Tangible IP) (Tangible IP) (PatLit) (IPOsgoode) Canadian Industry Minister asks whether the Investment Canada Act could apply to Nortel sale (Tangible IP) Ontario Superior Court rules on ways to recover domain names: South Simcoe Railway Heritage Corporation v Wakeford (JIPLP) Canada CRIA targets fair dealing: Tells… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
Issa and Others v Turkey; Bankovic and Others v Belgium and Others), but the facts in Al-Skeini - regarding the general state of affairs and the specific situations in which the shootings occurred - were not all that much stronger. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am
By Tobias ThienelIt's a good day for human rights law because the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has today delivered its judgments in Al-Skeini and Others v United Kingdom, Al-Jedda v United Kingdom and Bayatyan v Armenia. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
The Convention is a constitutional instrument of European public order (see Loizidou v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
Twombly (2007-1 Trade Cases ¶75,709). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:09 am
Complaint, supra, at ¶;¶ 22-25. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
One District Court has an answer: Nycomed v Tolmar (FDA Law Blog) Trizivir (Abacavir) – US: ViiV Healthcare files patent infringement complaint against Lupin in response to Para IV certification filing (Patent Docs) Welchol (Colesevelam) – US: Glenmarks settles litigation with Daiichi Sankyo, Genzyme (GenericsWeb) Xeloda (Capecitabine) – US: Hoffman-La Roche files patent infringement suits against Accord Healthcare, Teva and Roxane following Para IV… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
[¶] ? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
ChauhanSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in a recent decision in State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Indeed, Macdonell J. stated in the Bareham decision, at para. 27, that the only public policy reasons to be considered in interpreting s. 86: . . . are those in favour of protecting innocent third parties seeking compensation for injuries suffered at the hands of negligent automobile drivers and, vicariously, owners. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:20 am
McGill, 2008 BCCA 6, para. 59) or to fail to recognize the significance of a servient driver’s negligence (Gautreau v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
” (para 47). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
The contention that a State’s armed forces, by reason of their personal status, fall within the jurisdiction of the State for the purposes of article 1 is novel. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Indeed, the courts are of the view that an order to prohibit prosecution should only be given in exceptional circumstances (see, for example, the dicta of Denham J. in RC v DPP [2009] IESC 32 at para 10). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm
¶ 32, and that defendants did not make the overtime payments to which plaintiffs were entitled, id. at ¶;¶ 83-84. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In Tews v. [read post]
