Search for: "People v. Saling"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (IAM), Voting procedures set for WIPO DG vote next week: (Intellectual Property Watch), People: Change of IP guard at US, Australia missions; IFPMA readies new leader: (Intellectual Property Watch), What is intellectual property fraud? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
The Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur(1976) 4 SCC 124 this court held that the doctrine of stare decisis is a very valuable principle of precedent which cannot be departed from unless there are extraordinary or special reasons to do so. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm
In recent times, a third term, "Lawful orders" has become common parlance for some people. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5587
Seminerio -- Requires the district attorney to notify all victims of case disposition SUMM : Amd S440.50, CP L Requires the district attorney to inform a victim by letter of the final disposition of a case against a defendant, in order to give such victim the opportunity to exercise his right to give a victim impact statement. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5588
Morelle (MS) -- Authorizes… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:23 am
In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
., Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Tims v. [read post]
26 Oct 2024, 7:41 am
Lopez(1995) and United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:02 pm
With respect to the Criminal Code, an individual is considered to be in possession of narcotics or substances in any of the following circumstances: Individuals knowingly have the substance/narcotic on their person;The defendant knowingly has the substance/narcotic in possession, custody of another person, or in any place (whether or not that place belongs to or is occupied by the defendant and/or whether or not the drug is in that place for the defendant’s own benefit); orMore than… [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
”Crockford claimed that very few people knew that any of this was happening. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
CCOPS laws empower the people of a community, through their legislators, to decide whether or not city agencies may acquire or use surveillance technology. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am
Fullscale text sales weren’t within the scope of the controversy. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
