Search for: "S. et al" Results 4521 - 4540 of 29,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2008, 7:48 am
., et al., 04 Civ. 4314 (S.D.N.Y. - Decided: May 13, 2008), the court granted summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's claims as against the employer for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, and as against the Union for violating its duty of fair representation.The Plaintiff was the administrator of the Estate of her son, a deceased employee of Verizon and a union member. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
Maisel-Hollins Development Co. et al , Case Number 1:2007cv02351, filed September 5, 2007 According to court papers filed September 5, 2007, Plaintiff Extra Space Storage, LLC, a Delaware entity based in Salt Lake City, Utah, sued Maryland-based Defendants Maisel-Hollins Development Co., Extra Space Management Co. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:16 pm
Fleury-Graff, L’arrêt de la Cour supreme des Etats-Unis du 17 avril 2013, Kiobel et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:05 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Consumer Protection Lemon Law; attorney fees This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
On the News Release site on the Supreme Court of Canada's site, http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/news_release/2008/08-03-20.3/08-03-20.3.html, i.e., for 20 March, 2008, there is a note that the application for leave to appeal in III Canada Acquisition Company, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:10 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Jeremy Singer-Vine, Data is Plural: Agam Shah et al. have compiled a corpus of key communications by the US Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee, which “controls the three tools of monetary policy — open market operations, the discount rate, and reserve requirements. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:49 am by Gregory B. Williams
., et al., Civil Action No. 14-1268-SLR (D.Del., May 18, 2016), the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) after finding that Plaintiff’s claims for indirect infringement failed to state a plausible claim for relief. [read post]