Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES" Results 4521 - 4540 of 5,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 5:05 am by Steve Vladeck
Still, given both the dramatic nature of this particular result (unseating three of the seven sitting state supreme court justices), along with the increasing attention -- thanks at least in part to Justice O'Connor -- being paid to the issues raised by state judicial elections, I wonder if this result may end up being an even bigger story in the long-term than Harry Reid defeating Sharron Angle, or the size of the Republican swing in the House... [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The Democrats still control the Senate (51-D v 46-R) and downtown at White House. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:14 pm by cdw
  The Ohio State Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Harris appeals a judgment of conviction for substantial battery, see Wis. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court answered some of those questions. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:15 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaIn Charles Harris & Unique Products and Services v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Now that we have the reports from the third and final day of the meeting in Salt Lake City of ECUSA's Executive Council, we are finally able to fill in the picture of what is going on among the Church's elected and appointed officials. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last month about my certiorari petition in Herrera v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm by Julian Ku
Let me narrate the brief factual background of this case: On April 28, 2010, the Philippine Supreme Court issued its decision in Isabelita Vinuya et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm by lawmrh
Fortunately, the court’s opinion, which can be read in its entirety at No. 10–0520  IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm by Mike
  During an October 2008 IEP meeting the principal of Marin Waldorf, Anne Harris, stated that she thought DL should be in a regular class with an unspecified time with a resource specialist. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:33 am by Adam Schlossman
”  Because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) limits federal courts’ authority to grant habeas relief where a state court adjudicated the habeas petitioner’s claim “on the merits,” the Justices began their questioning of Harry Colombo, who represented the State, by asking how they could be sure the denial was on the merits. [read post]