Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 4521 - 4540 of 5,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
, 2010 WL 4870149, at *7 (quoting State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. [read post]
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Given the the entrenched positions on both sides of the immigration debate (a stated priority of the White House), patent reform remains the lowest hanging fruit. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
For example, a judgment against the State was upheld in National Westminster Bank, USA v State of New York, where the Bronx County Clerk, acting in his role as Clerk of the Supreme Court, failed to timely docket a judgment obtained by the claimant in Nassau County. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
Meet Marriage of Sagonowsky On December 21, 2016, San Francisco based First Appellate District issued a partly published decision in the case of Sagonoswky v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am by David Kris
Finally, Naksone writes that “[v]iolent extremist organizations have used the Internet to recruit terrorists, raise funds, direct violent attacks, and disseminate gruesome propaganda. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She claimed to have a common-law marriage, a concept not recognized in New York State. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am by John Culhane
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]