Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 4521 - 4540
of 85,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
In Davis v Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:48 pm
Solicitor General filed its highly anticipated brief in New Hampshire v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
EPA and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 9:06 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Comstock (No. 08-1224) United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
Stanford student Tiffany Cartwright previews tomorrow’s argument in Forest Grove School District v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:12 pm
The state argued in court documents that potential black jurors were struck based on an extensive background check rather than race, and there was no purposeful discrimination. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
As Maynard re-argued on Monday, “the gender line this statute draws is an arbitrary one. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
State, the decision Orin blogged about last month. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
There is no analytical help to be had from following the Supreme Court's lead and imputing "sovereignty" to the nation state, each of... [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:26 pm
Waddington, the case to be argued next week concerning Blakely retroactivity. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:16 pm
Young will brief and argue in support of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling that a federal judge has the authority to set a federal sentence to run consecutively to a state sentence not yet imposed. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210, (2d Cir. 2011), Kirtsaeng argued that the ‘first sale doctrine’ makes his actions legal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210, (2d Cir. 2011), Kirtsaeng argued that the ‘first sale doctrine’ makes his actions legal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210, (2d Cir. 2011), Kirtsaeng argued that the ‘first sale doctrine’ makes his actions legal. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:39 am
Blake v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
The “Jeffersonian Electoral College” was also designed, Foley argues, to produce a “federal conception of a compound majority-of-majorities. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
” Then, discussing the venerable case of Diamond v. [read post]
