Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 4521 - 4540 of 22,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sometimes this is an easy question, other times, slightly more complex. in MCCORD -v.- O'NEILL,; No. 08-3096-cv ; Summary Order; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2010 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sometimes this is an easy question, other times, slightly more complex. in MCCORD -v.- O'NEILL,; No. 08-3096-cv ; Summary Order; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
In 1978, the Fourth Circuit established that citizens "have a constitutional right of meaningful access to the courts which a state may not abridge nor impair, nor may it impermissibly burden its exercise. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:11 am
Employee charging employer did not appoint him because of age required to show that the employer's reasons given for rejecting him were pretextualSaia v Suffolk County Community College, 2009 NY Slip Op 05851, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Appellate Division dismissed Robert Saia's appeal in which he sought to recover damages for alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of age in violation of Executive Law §296, the State's Human… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
In June 2010, the First Circuit of the State of Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case of Lena Hebert et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
Walker 14-803Issue: (1) Whether a state’s voter ID law violates the Equal Protection Clause where, unlike in Crawford v. [read post]