Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 4521 - 4540 of 15,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court is as poised as it has been at any time since 1973 to overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:34 am by Sanford Hausler
  The District Court remanded the case to state court, holding that there was no federal question jurisdiction and that diversity jurisdiction was barred by 28 U.S.C. 1441(b)'s "forum defendant" rule. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
Thursday, Dec. 6 at 9:30 a.m.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am by Colby Pastre
This book is intended to help policymakers identify ways to make the states tax code more competitive. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Though commonly referred to as simply “freedom of speech,” the Charter‘s expressive guarantee under s. 2(b) is slightly more refined as, freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; Justice Lamer, in discussing the role of the media in light of competing interests such as the right to a fair trial, stated in Dagenais v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am by Michael Geist
In many disciplines – the sciences, health, engineering, and law to name several – open access is increasingly the standard, meaning that Access Copyright’s demands for licence payments would require hundreds of thousands of students to pay for copying that does not require a licence. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Imagine that, as between Candidates A and C, Candidate Bs voters prefer Candidate C by a margin of 16 to 14. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:50 am by skelly
  Further, the CJEU in Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co and Hotel Alpenhof v Heller (Joined cases C-585/08 and C-144/09) addressed a similar phrase in the context of a separate regulation. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday’s second case was Nieves v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
The IPKat has previously presented the court’s reasoning with regards to plausibility of second medical indication claims. [read post]