Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 35,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
And to suggest otherwise, as the COP does, seems to me to be a basic error in the application of the state action doctrine, unless they're arguing that banks are now state actors, via TARP (no way), or that, because of Shelley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:51 am
The Department is already defending the constitutionality of DOMA in Gill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:44 am
I discussed those dangers in a post last month (see: Empire State Building v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am
Salesforce and A.B. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 4:59 am
The New Hampshire Supreme Court just handed down a victory for free speech in Attorney General v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Following Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
Here is the introduction: The biggest news of OT 2020 was what didn't happen: In the run-up to, and aftermath of, yet another tight and hard-fought presidential election, the Supreme Court declined to double down on some of the worst aspects of the execrable Bush v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:40 am
The contract for deed stated that the purchase price was $30,000, to be paid with $3,000 down and 144 monthly payments of $300. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
See Koenigsberg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
This way, eligibility for federal benefits would not differ from state to state. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am
Even worse, if the provider still chooses not to appoint a representative, the BTK can apply to the Peace Criminal Court to throttle (slow down) the provider’s bandwidth by 50%. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
., v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:06 am
United States, No. 13-1487. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
In that decision, all nine judges voted to strike down the Separate but Equal standard, allowing state-sponsored segregation, that had existed since the Plessy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 11:13 am
The Colorado Supreme Court handed down this decision earlier this month in Boles v. [read post]
