Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 8,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
SEP holders would point to Chief Judge Rader's dissent all the time. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:09 pm
’” Campbell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Standard of review from Minister of Health is correctness Pfizer Canada v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:46 am
In Palm Springs Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
It states: If an owner of the patent or the holder of the approved application under [FDC Act § 505(b)] for the drug that is claimed by the patent or a use of which is claimed by the patent brings a patent infringement action against the applicant, the applicant may assert a counterclaim seeking an order requiring the holder to correct or delete the patent information submitted by the holder under [FDC Act § 505(b)] or (c) on the ground that the… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
At first blush, that sounds like a great idea for a mortgage holder because of all the problems facing these guys in state court when they attempt to foreclose. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:02 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
CRUM, Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-3522-B.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
A trademark holder may have a claim for infringement but not be entitled to a remedy under the UDRP. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
This issue has also been extensively (and fairly convincingly) dealt with by the Bombay High Court in Rolta India Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
According to the court ruling, Penguin had to show it suffered injury "within the state," which the lower court ruled it did not. [read post]
