Search for: "State v. Joseph" Results 4521 - 4540 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
  Tenaris’s Asserted FCPA Violation and Subsequent Investigation According to the Statement of Facts in the Tenaris DPA, in 2006 and 2007, Tenaris’s sales personnel for the Caspian Sea region (which accounted for only 1% of its total global sales and services between 2003 and 2008) allegedly engaged in a bid-rigging scheme involving four contracts with OJSC O’ztashqineftgaz (“OAO”), a subsidiary of Uzbekistan’s state-owned oil and gas company. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:20 am by Shima Baradaran
In this next post on the law review submission process (see intro, part I, part II on timing of submissions,part III interview, part IV interview and part V interview if you are interested in interviews with Stanford and Vanderbilt editors), I interviewed two articles editors, Joseph Ballstaedt (JGB) and Ryan Merriman (RM), and the editor-in-chief, Joe Orien (JAO) for 2012-13. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
  The judge concluded that the Respondent's witnesses' stated reasons for discharging Moran were inconsistent and, therefore, pretextual. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
The debtors received a refund of $684 from the state on July 9, 2009. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:39 pm by Patricia Hughes
(OCA, para.8-9) The OCA relied on the 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bhasin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Trump, being incapable of doing anything to appeal to people who are not already his devoted fans, decided that the only thing to do was to try (unsuccessfully) to tear down his strongest opponent.So without the pandemic, we would have seen the Democrats nominate someone who would have been leading Trump in the polls right away, notwithstanding the occasional out-of-context economic statistic that Trump and the Republicans might have trotted out.Moreover, the only action that Trump and his party had… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm by Aaron Moss
The New York Lawsuit The first volley in the parties’ legal battle came in May 2022, when Coakley filed a pro se lawsuit in New York state court against the Bergers and Virtuoso. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]