Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 19,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 7:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
Case Name: Winship v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
State v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
” This omission marks a significant oversight by the Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
The Learning Company v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” For The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports that “Moody unsuccessfully appealed to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:53 am
See Foman v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Neither trade mark covered digital assets.The French fashion house sued Hermés for trade mark infringement, essentially referring to a risk of confusion for consumers, as well as trade mark dilution and cybersquatting.Defendant Rothschild mainly centred his counterarguments on the Roger test (as established in 1989 case Rogers v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark | BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle | Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:45 am
Cir. 2012) (applying Fifth Circuit law and citing United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am
“”Administrative State Is THE Leading Threat to Civil Liberties of Our Era'”: Nick Gillespie interview with Philip Hamburger at Reason; Beyond the deference debates: White House Counsel Don McGahn speaks on Chenery I v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 12:10 pm
On September 21, 2011 Mark Fabiano, then 49 years old, was injured when he fell 18 feet to the pavement from a scaffold that he was helping to erect under a New York State Thruway bridge in Catskill. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Woods, Mark A. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
The General Court's decision On similarity of the marks, the General Court upheld the reasoning of the Board of Appeal and stated that all of the marks used the prefix "bo to" and that in Botox's case "bo tox" did not stand for 'botulinum' and 'toxin". [read post]
