Search for: "State v. Register" Results 4521 - 4540 of 13,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
 Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch) is a 1 December ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in which some of the best legal brains in that jurisdiction had to give some cogent thought to the meaning of the common-or-garden word "consents". [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:20 am by Chijioke Okorie
The draft stipulates that GI registered shall last for 10 years and may be renewed every 10 years subsequently, otherwise the same shall be removed from the register.GI registered in a foreign country shall be protected with clear evidence of eligibility for protection under the law of that country and it should have been in continual use up to the date of application for its registration in Nigeria.Part V deals with the usual rights conferred by GI registration (the right… [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am by Andres
These written commitments will be published in the U.S. federal register. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:21 pm
In fact, the ITC specifically states in the opinion that Apple failed to prove that Samsung had violated any FRAND obligation. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
This presumption reflects the requirements of international law, whereby one State should not infringe upon the sovereignty of another, and the rule of comity, which is founded on mutual respect between States. 2. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:08 am
Predictably, that has resulted in a great amount of uncertainty in cases that involve amalgamation of companies registered in states governed by the Indian Stamp Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]