Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 4,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
We had a case which we handed down last week – Takhar v Gracefield Developments Limited and others [2019] UKSC 13. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
With the stock market in freefall, the Treasury Department proposed a $700 billion “Troubled Asset Relief Program” (”TARP”) to buy toxic assets from the nation’s banks in order to shore up their balance sheets and restore confidence to the financial system. [read post]
SYNTHETIC DRUG BUSTS: FEDERAL ARRESTS FOR FAKE POT AND DESIGNER DRUGS THAT ARE LEGAL UNDER STATE LAW
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm
Except this isn’t true. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
No one can protect her from catching a cold; they are inevitable. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
Here it is up to the Working Group to consider and value input--and transparency in the way that is done. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
” (So… platforms can’t offer the service they want, and can’t withdraw from the market either?) [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
However, if we don't wise up in time, U.S. farmers will find agriculture off-shored, too, "for our own good. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Regulatory Science and the TTIP Reeve T. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
Extreme took a $223 million options-related charge last year, but Moore was lauded for cleaning up the problem. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
Don't get caught up in how much others are studying, how early in the semester people start outlining, or how confident others appear when answering questions in class. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/23/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSA3198
Pretlow (MS) -- Requires parolees who violate the terms of their release to be placed in the custody of the department of correctional services; repealerSUMM : Amd S259-i, rpld sub 3 P(a) subP (ii), Exec L Provides upon finding of reasonable cause that a parolee has violated the conditions of his or her release, such parolee shall immediately be placed in the custody of the department of correctional service for the purpose… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:13 pm
See NIFLA v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
Denial won't work. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
” The tighter definition of “specific selector requirement” created a problem for the government: What happened, say, if the government knew a terrorist was staying a hotel and making calls from it, but didn’t know which guest he was? [read post]
