Search for: "Way v. State"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 59,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
"Justice Greenwood agrees with Justice Grover, so that's now the law.Which provides a fairly healthy -- and successful -- way to NIMBY your way out of a sex offender living in your neighborhood, eh? [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
Essentially impossible; all the government has to do is to have its lawyers come up with a non-laughable post hoc argument for the way two different groups are treated that might potentially in some universe be true and, boom, the state wins.So it's noteworthy that the Court of Appeal here -- in the midst of a lengthy opinion on numerous distinct issues -- holds that the statute at issue violates equal protection.Not that the Court of Appeal is wrong; indeed, it's… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Tejada wrote: "It must be understood that I am 100% the subject of a United States government mind control experiment project that is on-going. [read post]
15 May 2025, 11:54 am
And I'll bet dollars to donuts that the prosecutor there made virtually the identical arguments that Paxton's making here -- that he was neutral, that state resources were limited, that he charged anyone under identical facts, etc. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 7:20 pm
When one’s trademark is used in an artistic or expressive way by another, courts have narrowly interpreted the Lanham Act (the primary federal statute governing trademark law in the United States) to avoid suppressing protected speech under the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:10 pm
But for those worried that Miller is nothing more than the continuation of the slow chipping away of both capital punishment and LWOP, with Justice Kennedy providing the key vote (see Roper and Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
MGN challenged the decision in Campbell v MGN (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) on Article 10 grounds. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
” The office relied on training from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, he said, adding, “It’s obvious it received bad training from the federal government. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
It’s time for a revival of mutual dignity and respect in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
The government should have either acted more quickly, or enacted the criminal offences in the ordinary way. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
Engle v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:12 am
HR Acquisition Corporation I v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
First, the PHA states that a “person” may commit the criminal offence or be liable for the civil wrong of harassment (sections 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:15 am
In the case, Scottsdale Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
Just like there's no "objective" way to tell virtually anything in the universe. [read post]
