Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 4541 - 4560 of 191,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 2:04 am by sally
Copple and others v Littlewoods plc and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1281; [2011] WLR (D) 319 “Where an employer’s pension scheme indirectly discriminated against part-timers on the ground of sex by denying them access to the scheme, a female part-time worker was not entitled to any remedy arising from her exclusion from the scheme if she would not in fact have chosen to join the scheme even if she had been eligible to do so.” WLR Daily, 8th November 2011 Source:… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:38 am by tracey
Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803;  [2011] WLR (D)  223 “The court had power to extend the time for compliance with a court order, pursuant to CPR r 3.1(2)(a), and to grant relief from a sanction prescribed by a court order as the consequence of a failure to comply within a specified time, pursuant to CPR r 3.8, even where the order had been made by consent. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:54 am
Yesterday, the case Third Circuit Court of Appeals case of Jefferson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:26 am by Lisa Baird
As reported on Drug and Device Law Blog, in a five-to-four decision by Justice Alito, the Supreme Court has decided Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by David Oscar Markus
I hate gotcha moments but wow, you gotta watch district court nominate (and current magistrate judge) Kato Crews bomb this question about Brady v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:07 am
We've just heard that Pinnock in Manchester CC v Pinnock has been given permission by the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:38 am
A default judgment has been entered against Patti Santangelo's daughter, Michelle Santangelo, in Elektra v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:01 pm
On July 25, 2007, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided two employment law cases that clarified that the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) applies to many individuals who have traditionally been considered independent contractors, D'Annunzio v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm by Tom Smith
Most Americans probably believed that the notorious HHS contraception mandate had been effectively nullified after the Supreme Court ruled against the Obama administration in Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:21 am
In a rather significant development in the TTAB's fraud jurisprudence, the Board has re-designated as precedential its decision in Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]