Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 8,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
” Weinberger v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:25 am
The movement to require safety belts on buses has been an ongoing battle for more than 50 years. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:47 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
(Alan S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
A: United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
… As the United States correctly observes, the regulation “reflect[s] the agency’s balance of competing considerations in a specific setting that could easily be upset by the intrusion of a general private remedy such as that provided under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
In its last major decision on the subject, in Ronnen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
This is because, like all keen IP bloggers, they are in a state of perpetual catch-up: the moment we take time off to read a piece of news, give it some thought and then write it up, something else suddenly crops up while we're not looking. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
In its 2010 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
We will have an uphill battle as we litigate these cases. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am
Circuit, and suggested that it is part of a larger battle over transparency at Guantanamo. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Right of Publicity * NY Times: As Legal Battle Continues, N.C.A.A. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
See, Solomon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 11:52 am
On January 7th, Attorney General Jon Bruning announced his latest battle in the war against patent trolls—the Nebraska Patent Abuse Prevention Act. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
Two Apple v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:54 pm
[1] Clapper v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
Two more developments in Aamer v. [read post]
