Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 34,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:59 pm
On September 4, 2008, in American Bankers Association v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:48 pm
IMDb.com v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:32 am
In comparison to federal law, California law already provides significant protections for both the sexual orientation and gender identity or expression of LGBTQ+ employees. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
Urbino v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:11 pm
In Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:32 am
Addressing apportionment issues left unresolved by the California Supreme Court’s decision in Montrose Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:40 pm
Rand v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
GDPR v CCPA is co-sponsored by FieldFisher, the California Lawyers Association Business Law Section, the High Tech Law Institute, and the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
Every time I look in more depth into the backstory of today's opinion by the California Supreme Court things seems to get curiouser and curiouser.The question presented is whether Norma and James Gund were engaged in "active law enforcement" when they responded to a request by the Trinity County Sheriff's Department to check up on their rural neighbor after the neighbor made a 911 call in which she whispered "Help me. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 7:20 pm
By the way, to my knowledge this case hasn't been covered in the mainstream media, even though it involves the first First Amendment challenge I know of to the Megan's Law provision.It is a very interesting result, but, ultimately, I don't think it will imperil Megan's Laws across the country. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:05 pm
In Gutierrez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court has just issued its decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:29 pm
As such, trademark law prevents unfair competition which can be damaging to businesses. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:26 pm
Professional Engineers in Calfornia Gvoernment, et al. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:21 pm
In Jessica Pineda v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 1:51 pm
(This case was Gentry v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:20 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated an arbitration award on the basis that the arbitrator’s refusal to abide by well-established California law in rendering its decision was in manifest disregard of the law. [read post]
