Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 13,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 7:59 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:10 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Horne v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:13 pm
District Court Judge Joseph Tauro in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 4:32 pm
Background: The Order to Show Cause and Administrative Litigation Maria Azzaro worked for the Trenton Board of Education. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
As Orin Kerr wrote of the Supreme Court’s 2001 thermal-imaging case, Kyllo v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
The dust continues to settle from the court’s unanimous rulings on Monday in two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
The Summary Plan Description identifies the District as the plan administrator and as the agent for service of legal process. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
In an opinion on Tuesday in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:45 am
Our case, Garza v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 12:15 am
Finally, the timing of the government's application is suspect, coming just weeks before the new administration takes office. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:54 am
Accidental disability retirementTuper v McCall, App. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am
Administrative agencies. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, well before Marbury v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court contributed to this shift a couple of years ago in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
One such exception arises when the employee is engaged in a "special errand" for the employer.In Neacosia v NY Power Authority, 85 NY2d 471, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board’s decision that a security officer [Officer], who was injured after he stopped on his way home to leave his work uniform at a cleaning shop, was acting within the scope of his employment and thus was eligible for workers' compensation… [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm
Company Law Interpretation (V) (Issued in late April, text found here, official commentary here). [read post]
