Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 8,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Davis (D), Luis V. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
For April, there are four opinions remaining: Plains Commerce (involving Indian tribes), Kennedy (death penalty for child rape), Davis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
The Court, citing Davis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
" (Doyle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 2:22 pm
This is a Nov. 13, 2006 opinion by PAC Karen Davis. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 9:10 am
and there was just a case out under the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, Quinn-Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:55 am
Shields and United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:46 pm
(Matter was distributed for conference several weeks ago but no additional action to date.)Davis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:11 am
Davis. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 7:52 am
Odom v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
This has been the law in Michigan since Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
Davis involves the former question, and a search issue as well. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Davis, 100 U.S. 257, 262-63, 25 L. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:01 pm
Global Sessions LP v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
“A legal malpractice claim requires that the plaintiff show that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession which results in actual damages to a plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence” (AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
Estate of Davis, 312 Ark 189 (1993)(defining interested persons); Spicer v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Buono, Black v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:40 am
" quoting Davis v. [read post]
