Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 7:40 pm
It does not water the subpoena process down or impose limitations. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:47 pm
It does appear that she is now suffering from acute bronchitis. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:31 am
And even Little were the producer, the poster does not establish that Littel owned the mark or that it has any prior rights vis-a-vis Respondent.Because of this lack of proof of ownership, Littel's claims of likelihood of confusion and fraud were dead.Fraud: Nonetheless, the Board went on the review what it considered to be a fraud claim asserted by Littel.We construe petitioner’s allegation that respondent’s registration should be cancelled because… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 pm
It should also be noted that the Court accepted that A2P1 does not require that students have access to the entirety of the national curriculum during temporary exclusions (this is most immediately relevant to the pupil referral unit, where the full national curriculum is not available). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:15 pm
To avoid any possible clear error and/or manifest injustice, the court will allow Defendants until Tuesday, November 16, 2010 to respond as to: 1) whether the court should reconsider the issue of tolling; and 2) if the court does, whether it committed clear error in application of the appropriate burden of raising or pleading tolling in this context and in granting the motion to dismiss before discovery had yet occurred. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
(For those familiar with the mutual fund industry, this is the sort of argument that does not pass the “laugh test. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm
In Ibanez and in the other two companion cases-Rosario and Larace-the Land Court ruled on the validity of three different scenarios relating to the date of the assignment vis- a- vis the date of the first publication of the mortgagee’s sale of real estate/foreclose sale. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:09 pm
You are probably in a stronger position vis a vis the penalty as it is understood that the rule in the Tiensia case does not apply if the deposit is unprotected when the tenant moves out. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
As long as you do any act with the intent to arose yourself vis-a-vis a child, you're guilty.Yet no one -- not even California -- goes that far. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Today, online intermediaries voluntarily seek to combat digital hatred, often addressing hate speech in their Terms of Service Agreements or Community Guidelines. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
Although the DOE does not address this in the guidance, federal civil rights laws also apply to workers at educational institutions receiving federal funds (this may also include libraries, training programs, etc.). [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
“The combat version does not have any doors or a roof. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:35 pm
The federal regulations provide that where a parent does not participate in the resolution meeting, the timelines for both the resolution process and the hearing will be delayed. 34 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Yet, since Mack-Ray did not participate at all in the inter partes reexaminations (claims allowed in first action), those records will not provide any potentially damaging statements vis-a-vis the litigation. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
I think that 70 does this.. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:35 pm
[3] Florida’s Statute Title VI, Chapter 49.031 [4] Trawick’s, supra N1, at page 169 [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
by Carlos F. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
To ensure a more consistent approach between firms as to who falls within the pool of Code Staff, the FSA have provided a set of non-exhaustive examples of the key positions they would expect to be classified as Code Staff.[10] In line with CEBS Guidelines, the Code requires provisions on guaranteed bonuses (see (vi) below) to be applied on a firm-wide basis and not just to Code Staff. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
Moreover, the Department recognizes that while section 752(c) of the Act provides that the Department shall consider the weighted average dumping margins determined in the investigation and subsequent reviews, among other factors, the Act does not require the Department to rely on the weighted average dumping margins, or any particular weighted average dumping margin, as the basis for its determinations in five- year (sunset) reviews where such reliance would render the determination… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
The Complaint does not allege that Plaintiff exhausted any of his FEHA claims through that particular charge. [read post]
