Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 2:54 pm
At what point does someone stop and say, Whoa? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Second, the policy does not provide a clear list of penalties for failed tests. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Second, the policy does not provide a clear list of penalties for failed tests. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm
Interestingly, it does not appear (from the file history) that Marathon ever filed a terminal disclaimer or otherwise discussed Preston’s patent. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Below we look at some of the themes and trends that emerge from the numbers. 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:37 am
Across the country, at least 37 people have been hospitalized. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:31 am
See 37 C.F.R. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:40 am
§ 41.37(c)(1)(vii) does not forbid new arguments in a reply brief that are not directed toward new points of argument in the examiner's answer, an appellant should not have to refile the application to have those arguments considered by the Board. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
" In summary, the Federal Circuit confirms that: 1. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm
Rule 41 does not discuss the potential content of a reply brief other than to note that the reply brief “shall not include any new or non-admitted amendment, or any new or non-admitted affidavit or other evidence. 37 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:56 am
--A plan must be amended to reflect the requirements of section 401(a)(37) and (if used by the employer) section 414(u)(9) by the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2010 (January 1, 2012, for governmental plans). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:27 am
First National Bank of Lake City, 81 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1955)], See also 37 Fla. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:17 am
Here, I think it's useful to turn to Susan Marks' excellent piece 'Human Rights and the Bottom Billion' (2009 European Human Rights Law Review, 1: 37-49). [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:08 am
(d) Section 37 does not apply to cases that fall within s. 36 but are specifically excluded by an Explanation. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
¶ 37.) [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
(Of course, even though tax deferral may be present, this does not mean that taxpayers should always utilize what they perceive as benefits under Code §1031. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
It does, however, raise some interesting issues that Nestle will need to respond to. 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 8:10 pm
Even if you do hit the two-month date, you're going to owe at least the 1-month EOT unless you file the RCE on the very same day the PTO mails the AA.So if you want to go straight to RCE, how can you reduce your vulnerability to final-on-first-OA-after-RCE? [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:22 pm
Barclays Bank, PLC, No. 08-11038 (5th Cir. 1/11/10) (pdf). [read post]
