Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 4541 - 4560 of 4,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 2:12 am by Dariusz Czuchaj
When .info Sunrise, .biz STOP, .name ERDRP and .mobi Sunrise and Premium Name cases are added to these UDRP figures, the total number of cases comes to 25,815 (Annex 1). [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
This is one reason why the Iraqi army made such poor showings in the Gulf War and in Operation Iraqi Freedom-1 (OIF-1). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:50 pm
Chairman Battista, dissenting in part, does not agree that the General Counsel has shown a violation as to Cook and Cole because the evidence does not establish that the Respondent knew that Cook and Cole were union adherents. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:38 am
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents of this Act is as follows:Sec. 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 4:19 pm
This places Duke's admirable graduation rates at risk, reinforces negative stereotypes, and does not serve the best interests of these students themselves, their peers, or their faculty. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:18 am
Great Value peanut butter that does not have the "2111" code is not included in the recall. . [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 4:04 am
See also 52 FR 20496, 20502-20505 (June 1, 1987). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:51 am
He made clear that 271(f) does not apply to the acts of copying AND selling abroad. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 6:41 pm
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (R. 41(a)(1)), the plaintiff has a right to dismiss an action before the other side serves its answer or a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 7:49 pm
Yu gives five reasons why the US [1] should not file a formal complaint based on the abovementioned articles.First, there is no clear definition for effective enforcement (see article 41(1) TRIPs). [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Specifically the problematic recommendations propose changing the Wills Variation Act.The Wills Variation Act permits a spouse or child to contest a will where it does not make adequate provision for them. [read post]