Search for: "E v. G"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am
According to the same BBC report, “[e]leven states and two union territories ban slaughter of cows, calves, bulls and bullocks. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:17 am
(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that: (1) the actor was not more than three years older than the victim and at the time of the offense: (A) was not required under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by Chapter 668, Acts of the 75th Legislature, Regular Session, 1997, to register for life as a sex offender; or (B) was not a person who under Chapter 62 had a reportable conviction or adjudication for an offense under this sectio [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Zehra G. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
Motion pictures that are lawfully made and acquired from DVDs protected by the Content Scrambling System or, if the motion picture is not reasonably available on or not reasonably available in sufficient audiovisual quality on DVD, then from digitally transmitted video protected by an authentication protocol or by encryption, when circumvention is accomplished solely in order to incorporate short portions of motion pictures into new works for the purpose of fair… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
")In The Driver's SeatPost-Koken decision making dominated the field of auto insurance law in 2009By Daniel E. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
Coughlan & G. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:00 am
À la lumière de la preuve et des facteurs énoncés dans R. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Ils sont protégés par la doctrine de l’exclusivité des compétences. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER MODIFYING CHILD SUPPORT ORDER.ROBERTS (COURTNEY G.)VS.BEDARD (ERIC)OPINION AFFIRMINGCLAYTON (PRESIDING JUDGE)STUMBO (CONCURS) AND THOMPSON (CONCURS)2011-CA-000212-METO BE PUBLISHEDFAYETTE CLAYTON, JUDGE: Courtney G. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER MODIFYING CHILD SUPPORT ORDER.ROBERTS (COURTNEY G.)VS.BEDARD (ERIC)OPINION AFFIRMINGCLAYTON (PRESIDING JUDGE)STUMBO (CONCURS) AND THOMPSON (CONCURS)2011-CA-000212-METO BE PUBLISHEDFAYETTE CLAYTON, JUDGE: Courtney G. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:40 am
”; (G) by inserting before paragraph (2) (as redesignated), the following: “(1) ASSAULT OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OR CORRECTIONAL OFFICER. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:25 pm
In the People of the State of California v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:58 am
Sabemos que sus clases e investigaciones se nutrirán de todo ello”, manifestó el decano Prof. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:58 pm
Id. at comment g. e. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:02 am
" That the provisions are a "cause of concern" appears to be a massive understatement.Typically, tax avoidance is considered to be legal; tax evasion is illegal (Azadi Bachao Andolan v. [read post]
