Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
In an appeal to the JCPC that involves an issue of English law on which a previous decision of the House of Lords, Supreme Court or Court of Appeal is challenged, the members of the JCPC can, if they think it appropriate, not only decide that the previous decision was wrong, but also can expressly direct that domestic courts should treat their decision as representing the law of England and Wales. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
It remains to be seen how the English courts will deal with these issues. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
’)” Moseley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
June 13, 2016, was the 50th anniversary of the famous Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
It will consider whether a tort of malicious prosecution of civil proceedings does or should exist in English law. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., https://t.co/sqpbd508hg -> Click wrap agreement enforced MOULE v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
" Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:36 am
She didn’t initially report his conduct due to her fear of losing her job, her poor English-speaking abilities, and his threats of revealing her true identity. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
In its response to plaintiff’s lawsuit, A.M. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:15 pm
With NL away on his summer holidays I have picked up the Supreme Court judgement in Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40 The case of Edwards v Kumarasamy has now seen a final decision from the Supreme Court with the Court overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal in two key areas. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
The jurisdiction is mandated by Article 8(3) of The Information Society Directive which was transposed into English law pursuant to Section 97A of the UK Copyright Act. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Privacy Shield 2.0 Signed, Sealed and Delivered https://t.co/JejWTm6iNe -> Case Law: Cartier v BSkyB, Website blocking orders against ISPs upheld https://t.co/DnJHxCUbW1 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-07-10 https://t.co/ahJvjVo7iY -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-07-10 https://t.co/vwDPYUMHbb -> Today in Copyright Infringement: Live from Montreal https://t.co/v6KaeO09BI -> How far can the English courts go in blocking websites – and who… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
In the English case of Otomewo v Carphone Warehouse Limited [2012] ET 2330554/11, two employees used the store manager’s iPhone without his permission and updated his Facebook status to read: “Finally came out of the closet. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am
Martin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am
Since the first instance decision, we have seen the High Court fashion new forms of injunction, most recently in the form of the notification order in Holyoake and another v Candy and others. [read post]
