Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 4:35 pm
Earlier in the day, Special Agent Antonio Patrick Edwards, who works for the Army’s Computer Crime Investigation Unit, testified that he got the chats from Lamo after receiving an e-mail from Chet Uber, a civilian who worked with Lamo as part of a cyber security initiative. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:43 am
”There's some comfort, knowing that Camp's decisions must pass justice-muster with the United States Attorney. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 10:03 pm
In another case, a distinguished MIT professor of computer science spent a month with his wife cycling across the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:52 pm
The Members’ frustration arose not so much from Shkreli’s attitude as from the fact that the Members knew they lacked the political will to actually hold him in contempt (and then to try and convince the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia to prosecute him). [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:14 am
There were 23 million divorced people in the United States in 2005, according to the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
The complaint describes that two ex parte reexamination requests were filed against the ‘218 patent. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Reversing in part, the appeals court also addressed two other issues of first impression, holding that the AKA requires proof of a link between the kickback and a specific instance of favorable treatment and that, for purposes of the statute of limitations, the government’s AKA claim related back to the relators’ original qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:47 am
Bush, Judge Mauskopf was a prosecutor, rising to United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position she held for five years before being appointed judge. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:42 am
” The Second Circuit nevertheless held, contrary to the decisions of three other circuits and the views of the United States and the [FTC], that, except in very limited circumstances, a pharmaceutical patentee may lawfully pay a generic drug manufacturer to forgo judicial testing of the patent’s validity and stay out of the market. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 10:03 pm
In another case, a distinguished MIT professor of computer science spent a month with his wife cycling across the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
I thought that part of my postcard this week should have a judicial theme…. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:04 am
Schedule A Defendants Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TRO–SEC v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
It should be noted that the issue classifying actions as direct versus derivative remains in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
