Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 21,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
In the appellate decison of United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Justice Manson had suggested that the doctrine was not applicable in Canada, stating: Some United States Courts have held such use can cause “initial interest confusion”, where confusion is caused in the customer before actually purchasing a good or service, when the customer seeks a particular brand of goods or services, but is drawn or enticed to a competitor’s goods or services through the competitor’s use of the first… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:23 am
During the prosecution, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:15 am
In 2005, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an opinion in the case styled, Howard v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:43 am
United States, 29 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1928). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm
United States felt like a legislation class in law school, with various canons of statutory construction being bandied about. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
See Diamond Hong, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:24 am
After a recent blow to academic freedom and free speech by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, this is a heartening opinion. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
In Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA [Case C-543/10], the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU, previously known as the European Court of Justice) interpreted Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 on jurisdiction (the Article) to mean that where the general terms of a sale of goods contract incorporated a clause conferring jurisdiction, that clause could only be relied upon against the original parties to the… [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 401 (2012). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
In that setting, the United States admitted that the judge's conduct was improper. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 am
I was gratified Sunday to read the New York Times article, Supreme Court Term Offers Hot Issues and Future Hints, depicting the 2010-2011 United States Supreme Court Term in graphical images. [read post]
