Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 4541 - 4560 of 120,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2012, 9:35 pm by Patent Docs
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Of 'Use' and Labels: Recent Appellate Decisions in Hatch-Waxman Litigation" on May 3, 2012 beginning at 2:00 pm (ET). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:48 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Ipock, et al, CR60 may be used to disestablish paternity with the results of a completed DNA test in which case the results of the test shall be the predominant factor in the trial court’s decision. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will also consider what questions may remain unanswered after Helsinn v.... [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:19 pm
On 21 May, Capt Fredland of Air Force Appellate Defense filed a cert petition in Banker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm by William Morriss
Second, it has some interesting (and probably useful) examples of rhetoric and explanations which can be used to sway a (presumably) technologically unsavvy judge to your side. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by Walter James
The sketches were created in connection with a proposed recirculation line reportedly requested by the City in a mandate issued on May 29, 2007. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:29 am by Eric Goldman
Yost Louisiana’s Age Authentication Mandate Avoids Constitutional Scrutiny Using a Legislative Drafting Trick–Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:40 am
A landmark decision of the House of Lords in A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6 may mean that insurers covering UK employers for similar abuse claims will begin to share the US's experience.A v Hoare concerned the limitation period applicable to cases of sexual abuse. [read post]
  Conversely, a favorable outcome for OAK could impact how geographical trademarks are used in brand identification, creating a precedent that using geographically descriptive names may not lead to trademark disputes. [read post]