Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:28 am
This is not unlike the personal computer that the defendant in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:39 pm
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:49 am
In Hans v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Minow, Martha. 1998. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:55 pm
Oct. 18, 2010), Judge Arpert lists a number of cases cited by the Plaintiff, and left in the Bloomberg Law citations: United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:58 am
“The overriding consideration in this case,” the judge ruled, “is that some of the very same issues Plaintiff presents here are currently pending for decision before the Supreme Court of the United States,” citing the case of Baze v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
The United Kingdom is a multi-cultural society. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:47 am
” Although Greenliant filed its trademark application on an intent-to-use basis, it appears from the website that the GREENLIANT mark is already in use in connection with solid-state storage drives, flash memory, and NAND controllers. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 7:43 am
United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
— The Supreme Court is considering a cert petition in Genius v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:15 pm
EPIC: “A legal settlement filed in ACLU v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:43 am
However, prior to Dauben’s positive verdict, Southern filed its claim in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
