Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 22,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
The court said that PERB ruling was not irrational and therefore should not be disturbed. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:01 am
But the priority right now, so it is never a good idea to absolutely rule things -- rule things out no matter what. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Quoting the Supreme Court’s ruling in Camara v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm
This is “Occurrence and Levels of Fecal Indicators and Pathogenic Bacteria in Market-Ready Recycled Organic Matter Composts” (9), a study submitted in early 2008 and published in 2009. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
The Ruling Citing NLRB v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
The Ruling Citing NLRB v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:04 am
And the only issue was whether defendant’s advertisements, the contents of which were not disputed, violated the injunction – a matter of law. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
" That distinction was abolished in 1937 with the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 2 declares that there is only one form of action, thus merging law and equity. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
TecSec then stipulated that it could not prove infringement by defendants under the claim construction adopted by the district court during the proceed- ings with IBM. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:44 am
Even without post-election manipulation, a "Republican trifecta" state government (one with Republican majorities in both legislative chambers and a Republican governor) can adopt any process it likes to choose electors, no matter how obviously tilted toward their party. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
In a case that sent shudders through the California employer community, the ABC test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Dayton, 167 Ohio App.3d 172, 2006-Ohio-2917, 854 N.E.2d 532 (2d Dist.), overruled in part on other grounds (adopting the no proximate cause rule.) [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:10 am
Agreeing that this is “a reasonable and workable rule,” the court adopted this approach, holding that an average age difference of 10 years or more between a plaintiff and the replacements will be presumptively substantial, whereas an age difference of less than 10 years will be presumptively insubstantial. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am
” Some of the points of complexity engaged here go to matters of substance. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
I have read this sentence over and over again, and I don't think I've ever seen anything like that in a U.S. ruling, let alone by higher courts. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:35 pm
This post covers the CEQA issue at the “tail end” of the opinion, which involved application of CEQA’s “subsequent review” rules to County’s partial road abandonment project. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:58 am
This change is certainly welcome in this province and has already been adopted in other Western provinces, including British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
The bill would require concurrent expedited record preparation and require the Judicial Council to adopt rules such that actions would be resolved within 270 days of the administrative record’s certification. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 10:55 am
The SJC noted that it had already ruled, in an earlier case, that the Buckhannon test does not apply to Massachusetts fee-shifting statutes, but it had never explicitly adopted the catalyst test. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
However, it rejected the argument that there is a “federal rule of law implicit in the Constitution that requires all of the states to adhere to the sovereign-immunity doctrine as it prevailed when the Constitution was adopted. [read post]
