Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 7,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm
To make a long story short, despite the fact that the completed PCT application was circulated by ATS&K to Protostorm’s principals, its corporate counsel, Hogue and to Worthington, no one notices that fact that the PCT box for the United States had not been checked, and that no separate U.S. patent application had been filed. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
Of course, to users, they see NO difference whatsoever using hosted v. local Exchange Server – they just use Outlook as they’ve always been (but with LOTS more storage and no one badgering them to delete old email every week). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
/p> [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
/p> [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
” The Wilson v Wilson case brought into focus the issue of long hours in mediation, and the possible effect of wearing parties down toward settlement. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm
” P. 354. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:10 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
But that Amendment died and was buried so long ago that even the Supreme Court doesn’t remember it. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:49 am
Vê-se assim que o problema não é simples e que não existe solução pronta para resolvê-lo. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Torvik recently posted about the case of Pacific v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:45 pm
Michael Waterstone has this post at Prawfblawg on today’s Supreme Court opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:18 am
Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
Applying some of these important discoveries to people, evolutionary biologists, economists and psychologists agree that people cooperate only if it is in their long-term self-interest. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
No. 94-473, p. 62 (1975) (hereinafter Senate Report). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
” Comment Two further cases ML and AR v RWB and SWB (2012) Fam Law 13 and Re P and L (2011) EWHC 343 1, the judgments of which post-date this appeal, attempted to lay down some guidance when dealing with cases which concern children born to two female parents and a known male parent. [read post]
