Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Relying heavily on Skilling v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am
And they highlighted that we in the United States know almost nothing about the Tragedy and the apparently significant role of the United States as the post-World War II peacetime military force in South Korea with control over the Korean military and national police. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am
The fact that the media has latched on to that demonstrates how exceptional that is v. common fannish gift economies. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:20 am
” The plaintiffs argue the law violates “equal protection, free speech, and free association protected by the Massachusetts and United States constitutions” and are seeking a permanent injunction preventing the OCPF from enforcing the law banning corporate contributions. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
I begin by summarizing four key takeaways from the pages that follow: The administration has not abandoned its claims of authority to attack ISIL under Article II or the 2001 AUMF, rendering the constraints set forth in the draft AUMF largely (though not entirely) academic as a legal matter. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the main opinion that the 2002 law was so broadly worded that it “covers the waterfront, including fish from the sea. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As I wrote herein November:[I]t is not a violation of federal law for an undocumented alien to remain in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
[United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Oh, by the way, I suppose it also is relevant that the United States Trustee did not object to either Baker Botts’s original fee or the fee it requested for the cost of defending its application, and that the bankruptcy judge rejected all of ASARCO’s challenges to the underlying fee award. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:08 pm
From Levitt v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
