Search for: "People v. Deem"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
The legislation would require companies that sell products like mortgage-backed securities to keep some "skin in the game" by retaining at least five percent of the credit risk so that, if the investment doesn't pan out, the company that made, packaged and sold the investment would lose out right along with the people they sold it to. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
The answer is that we seem to worry about people being misled, and we seem to worry about their being misled about a number of things. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held, in Heck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm
” [6] It allows communication between people in different places and simultaneously through equipment reproducing images and sound. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
Like the countless other risks I assume every day, including crossing the street, I assumed these risks because I deemed that the value of the underlying activity outweighed the magnitude of the harm, discounted by the probability that it would occur. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
I suspect the merger of the two will create unexpected headaches for courts, platforms, and even the people the duty of care was supposed to help: individuals or businesses harmed by illegal content online. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:01 am
Professor Buchanan cites Perry v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
Prior to sentencing, the People filed a predicate felony statement alleging that on January 9, 1989, Lapidus had previously been convicted of the felony of assault in the second degree in Kings County. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 5:44 am
Take the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
-Saudi relationship and hold the Saudi government accountable for abuses ranging from the brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi to “murdering children and murdering innocent people” in Yemen. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
Either way, as my prior post mentioned, it’s a basic design flaw to have the people who will approve/deny any board recommendations also vote as regular members. [read post]
