Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 4541 - 4560 of 44,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Whitepages The post Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
” In May 2017, LinkedIn sent hiQ a C&D and blocked its IP addresses. hiQ sought relief from the courts. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
But people may also want to stop coercive subpoenas aimed at uncovering their identities as potential defendants. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Supreme Court’s decision last June in West Virginia v. [read post]
(“Vale”), a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, with making misstatements about its ESG disclosures prior to the January 2019 collapse of its Brumadinho dam, which killed 270 people and caused significant environmental and social harm. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am by Eugene Volokh
("[W]e recognize that religious beliefs may develop over time and that people may transgress religious beliefs that are nonetheless sincerely held …. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Recognizing that some people might be more vulnerable to community stigma because of their religious community membership could well be praised as the governmental "neutrality in the face of religious differences" that Sherbert v. [read post]