Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 4,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
"Illustrations" are used in ALI publications to provide models that explain how things work, not only on the precise facts, but under similar facts. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
See Wright v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 4:51 am
" That, I guess, explains Plessy v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
“My people were working people,” Strine says. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Explicitly rejecting the Supreme Court's decisions in Sutton v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder v… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
To suggest that people who really care will give up the protections provided by court oversight is to do a vast disservice to most of our clients. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 2:16 am
But Tommy suggests this is inconsistent with the First Amendment principles recognized in Cohen v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
These so called No. 3 (or No. 5) Civil Divisions, can be found at the Supreme People’s Court, all High People’s Courts, Intermediate People’s Courts in all provincial cities and many big cities, and even a few Basic People’s Courts. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:03 am
The Defendant's mental condition at the time of the offense bars the adoption of the death penalty under the rationale of Atkins, 536 U.S. 304 and Roper v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
P. 26.3 lessens the degree of deference accorded to a district court's finding of manifest necessity of a mistrial; but 3) an analysis of the factors for consideration of declaration of a mistrial contained in Comment 9.06 of the model criminal jury instructions supported the conclusion that there was manifest necessity to declare a mistrial in this case. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 1:59 pm
In the aftermath of the LSUC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 1:59 pm
In the aftermath of the LSUC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:34 pm
In a nutshell, even an amicable divorce can be like Kramer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
