Search for: "People v. Saling"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
(See McCollum v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
” Trademark protection in the absence of consumer confusion at the point of sale is justified, at least in part, as a means of preserving the status of consumers of “true” luxury products, even if no one ever makes a mistaken purchase. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
That case is R. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
V. c.46 (1911). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
In Moeller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
His election to Senate, therefore, depends on the good people of Vermont. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 23, 2009)Affirming $1.3M JV (minus $90K remittitur) for sales rep on his disability (bipolar)/failure-to-accommodate claim>> Abraham v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6] Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
I then explained in more detail why the abandoned Lochner Court case (Eisner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
I then explained in more detail why the abandoned Lochner Court case (Eisner v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Moore and The Nuchatlaht v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:10 am
The civil law relating to clamping was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest.[2000] EWCA Civ 106.In the Vine case, the earlier case of Arthur v Anker and another [1997] QB 564 is discussed.The Vine caseThe appellant in this case was Helen Vine. [read post]
