Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 4541 - 4560 of 12,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Lord Glennie did not consider that anything which had been pleaded in the present case created any sort of special circumstance where the director would be found personally liable for the company.He also considered the argument that Mr Emerson was jointly liable with Alba as tortfeasor because he either procured or assisted it in its wrongdoing (CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics plc [1988] UKHL 15,Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2015] UKSC10). [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm by Jon Sands
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even though this might be the case at face value, the use and exploitation of those rights should still have certain limitations, for example, from preventing an author from allowing certain people from reading their book after they have purchased a copy. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has published its support of the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s revised measures to protect people from anonymous trolls with the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
Even as it sought to undermine all sorts of laws, HavenCo’s model of a data haven still took law itself a bit too much for granted. [read post]