Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER" Results 4541 - 4560 of 7,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 7:43 am by Norman L. Eisen
Danya Perry, Debra Perlin, Kayvan Farchadi and Jason Powell, Trump on Trial: A Model Prosecution Memo for Federal Election Interference Crimes, Just Security (July 13, 2023) Analysis Laurence H. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
” On page 13, in a long footnote (number 7), the majority says that the FMR companies “are not acting as agents for employment purposes of the Fidelity mutual funds, which are public companies but have no employees. [read post]
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
The attendance records further indicated that Young stayed at the homeless shelter on June 2, 3, 13, and 14, 2014, and did not return again until September 17, 2014.State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:41 am by Roger Parloff
That’s the window through which the very first rioter penetrated the Capitol building at about 2:13 p.m. on Jan. 6. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Section 110(c)(5) should be deleted. 1798.120(d): The language is inconsistent about 16 year olds (or, if you read the restriction as applying only to 14 and 15 year olds, then it’s inconsistent about 13 year olds): “a business shall not sell the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, in the case of consumers between 13 and 16 years of age, or the… [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:39 am by INFORRM
His remarks were echoed by the home secretary, Douglas Hurd, the foreign office minister, William Waldegrave, and indeed Mrs Thatcher herself. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Perhaps not surprisingly in the wake of phone hacking, the Prime Minister appears to be steadily curtailing his personal contact with senior media figures, based on data released by the government for 2011-13. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
To the contrary, in People in Interest of J.T., 13 P.3d 321, 322 (Colo. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
On April 13, 2005, the Union was certified as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of a unit of employees working for Act Fast at its Harlingen, TX facility. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Charge filed by Metropolitan Lithographers Association, Inc.; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(3). [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We are seeking to harmonize the minimum price increment where stocks can be quoted and transacted as well as lower these minimum increments across the markets.[12] Lastly, we put out a proposal to bring greater competition for a segment of the market related to individual investors’ marketable orders.[13] Private Funds Last month, we finalized a rule that, among other things, will require private fund advisers registered with the Commission to provide detailed disclosure to investors… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Guest on ABC 13 To Discuss Section 3 of the 14th Amendment (1/12/21) Quoted in Trump faces loss of pensions and perks if removed from office, Nikkei Asia (Jan. 12, 2021). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
But any such facts could and should be submitted to the board itself, preferably with the grounds of appeal (Articles 12(2) and 13(1) RPBA). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8) propriety of… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:06 am by Susan Brenner
Section 13-2316(A)(7) provides as follows: A person who acts without authority or who exceeds authorization of use commits computer tampering by . . . [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Ninth Circuit: Well, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act isn't a bar. [read post]