Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 4541 - 4560 of 41,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:07 am by Howard Friedman
State officials with enforcement power have either refused to state which abortion laws take precedence or have taken inconsistent positions on the matter.5. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am by INFORRM
Also, s.97(2), CA 1989 makes it a criminal offence for anyone to publish any material which is likely to identify any child as being involved in proceedings in which any power under the Children Act 1989 or the Adoption and Children Act 2002 may be exercised with respect to that or any other child, or their address or school, unless the court has made an order disapplying the effect of s.97(2), as to which jurisdiction see Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882; [2022] EMLR 11. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
In the years since Marshall’s 1833 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:16 am by Eisha Jain
United States and Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]